Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a incredibly newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's also just a little heavier.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A31, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has higher video frame rate and a back facing camera with much more megapixels. Galaxy A31 has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A31 has superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.