Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an overall score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only construction is notably newer, extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has faster video frame rates, a lot higher resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features superior battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.