Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A34's body is way thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has older 13 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy A34 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a camera that is very similar to the Motorola Droid Turbo one, although the Samsung Galaxy A34 also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way more MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has improved battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.