Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 81.7 against 76.4. Galaxy A41's construction is incredibly newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A41 has older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display pixel density. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A41, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and better video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy A41 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.