Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 86.6 score against 76.4. Galaxy A50s's design is notably newer, a lot thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A50s also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way more mega-pixels back camera. Galaxy A50s counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.