Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy A51 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A51, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.