Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a extremely newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it's just a little bit heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot more MP back camera.
Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.