Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a global score of 90.7 against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is extremely newer and notably thinner, but just a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh. The Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.