Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Although Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and also a lot newer. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has a better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture and higher 30 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.