Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a general score of 91.1 against 76.4. Even though the Galaxy A52s is a bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's way thinner and extremely newer. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has less processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s has a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has higher video frame rates, a larger aperture and a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy A52s has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.