Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. The Motorola Droid Turbo body is way older, extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A6. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little faster processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A6 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A6 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP and a lot higher video definition.
Although Motorola Droid Turbo is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.