Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a general score of 76.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but Motorola made it just a bit lighter anyway. Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.