Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 76.9 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A70 body is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A70 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.