Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy F62 design is way newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F62, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments, a lot more MP camera and higher 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.