Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 97.6 score against 76.4. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is way newer and noticeably thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Motorola Droid Turbo features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and much more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments. The Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 12 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.