Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M20 has the older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy M20 construction is much newer and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it's just a little heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy M20, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot more MP camera and a lot better (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M20 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.