Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a score of 82.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy M30's design is incredibly newer, a little bit lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy M30 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy M30 has longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.