Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 87.7 against 76.4. The Galaxy M51 is a a lot newer and thinner phone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's also somewhat heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy M51 has much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M51 also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.