Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Galaxy Note 20's body is way newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Motorola Droid Turbo has a better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.