Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a way newer device, and it's also way thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.