Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a overall score of 89 against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a newer cellphone, and it is also extremely thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.