Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the previous 4.4.2 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note3 is older than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's body is notably thinner and a little bit lighter.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 4 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has an additional graphics processor.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 64 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.