Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Galaxy Note4's construction weights the same than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's a lot thinner. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a little better display density.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processing unit. Galaxy Note4 features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note4 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Note4, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh. The Galaxy Note4's camera is just as good as the Motorola Droid Turbo one, although the Galaxy Note4 has a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.