Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a score of 79.5 against 76.4. Galaxy Note7's body is newer, a little lighter and much thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note7, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low-light situations and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy Note7 has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.