Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy S10 body is much newer, somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much larger aperture.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.