Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 89.7 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and also a lot newer. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen pixels density. Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.