Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better images in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.