Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 98 score against 76.4. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is notably heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's a lot thinner and also notably newer.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 28% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels, a much better video quality and a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.