Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 93.4 against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a way newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S22, because although it has less and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy S22 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and way lesser pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a much higher video definition and a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.