Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 95.4 score against 76.4. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is incredibly newer and much thinner, but extremely heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a much larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.