Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 82.6 score against 76.4. The Galaxy S25 body is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo and Galaxy S25 count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy S25 has a much worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a larger display.
Galaxy S25 has a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.