Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 79.5 score against 76.4. The Galaxy S7 is a newer cellphone, and it is also notably thinner and lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a little larger screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and lower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S7 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 200 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.