Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is much newer, but a lot heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola Droid Turbo captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot better 20.7 MP resolution camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.