Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 81 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also somewhat heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels density.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition. Galaxy XCover Pro has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.