Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Although Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and a lot newer. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3900mAh battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.