Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 85.6 score against 76.4. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and much newer. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and more processing cores. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.