Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 92.3 score against 76.4. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way newer and way thinner phone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it is just a little heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.