Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and also a lot newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 9 GB more RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.