Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-12 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a overall score of 87.2 against 76.4. Xperia 5 II is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also noticeably thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Xperia 5 II features a little bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a little higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Xperia 5 II captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Xperia 5 II has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Xperia 5 II features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Sony Xperia 5 II is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Sony Xperia 5 II, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.