Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ Premium is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 76.4. Even though Xperia XZ Premium is just a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and incredibly newer. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
Xperia XZ Premium has a little bit better display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840, a bit larger screen and a better pixels count in each display inch. Xperia XZ Premium takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.