Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 79 score against 76.4. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Xperia XZ2 Compact design is extremely newer and a little bit lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is just a little bit thicker.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola Droid Turbo, because although the Xperia XZ2 Compact has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little more vivid screen than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little greater display density.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a lower video resolution and a lower resolution back camera, they both have a same size aperture. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo features improved battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.