Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 77.2 score against 76.4. Xperia XZs's body is noticeably newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a better display than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Sony Xperia XZs has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Sony Xperia XZs also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 34 percent greater battery size. Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a camera in the back with a worse 19 megapixels resolution and a lower video definition, they both have a F2 diafragm aperture.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Sony Xperia XZs, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.