Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro has an overall score of 84.5, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. The Xiaomi 14T Pro design is much newer and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi 14T Pro has 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a really superior performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a GPU. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi 14T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features improved battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.