Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's body is much newer and a little bit thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and 4 more processing cores. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a way better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rates, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.