Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 80.6 score against 76.4. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite body is incredibly newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has lesser CPU cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has higher video frame rates, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.