Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 91.5 against 76.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's design is extremely newer and way thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has older 12 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a processor that is just as good as the Motorola Droid Turbo one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (but slower). Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer captures greater photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.