Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 76.6 score against 76.4. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's extremely thinner and notably newer. These phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has 4 lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features improved battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has faster 30 fps video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.