Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a much newer and thinner cellphone than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has better video frame rate, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better device, it is more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.