Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a notably newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's also a little bit heavier. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola DROID Turbo works with Android 4.4.4 operating system.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better looking screen than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a bit better screen pixels density. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a better performing processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM, a 64 bits processing unit and a higher number of cores.
IPhone 12 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.