Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. IPhone XR's construction is a lot newer and much thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel count per inch of display and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Apple iPhone XR has a bit better CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a higher number of cores (although slower). Apple iPhone XR has a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The iPhone XR's memory to install games and applications is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo features greater battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.